Spotting Long-Term Trends

Investing is about the future, and being able to distinguish true paradigm shifts from ordinary business cyclicality is important.

In this quarter’s outlook, we’ll consider examples of two long-recognized catalysts of fundamental market shifts — climate change and the internet — that again made headlines in the second quarter. We believe developments in both areas continue to shape winners and losers in the current market and beyond. Before we explain further, let’s review notable market performance trends through the second quarter of the year.

Non-US, Growth and Large Cap Extend Performance Leadership

The S&P 500 Index completed the first half of the year with a strong 9.34% return. While second quarter performance was a solid 3.09%, it did not match the torrid pace of the first quarter.
Growth stocks continued to outpace value in the second quarter by a wide margin (Russell 1000 Growth Index returned 4.65% vs Russell 1000 Value Index return of 1.34%). From a size perspective, large caps outperformed small caps, but only marginally.

Non-US equities were the big story in the second quarter, with the MSCI EAFE Index returning 6.12% for the quarter, significantly extending its lead over the S&P 500 year-to-date (13.81% vs. 9.34%).

In June, there were indications that some changes in leadership may be taking place. Large cap value stocks bounced back strongly to outperform their growth counterparts, and the Russell 2000 Index strongly outperformed the large-cap S&P 500 Index. More importantly, broad market returns both in the US and abroad were dampened compared to earlier in the year. We are closely considering whether lofty valuations and renewed concerns of rising interest rates are poised to slow the market in the second half of the year.

Climate Change Shift in Power

The ability of the public sector (government) to influence business financial performance is weakening in some areas. Climate change is a case in point. We believe the current shift of power from the Federal Government to local governments and business is more fundamental than a temporary deviation from normal. That is why we believe that the Trump Administration’s decision to pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement in June, while undeniably regrettable, will not undo the momentum that the private sector and local governments have garnered in transitioning to a lower-carbon world.

In the last decade, and particularly in the last few years, investors have increasingly seen climate change as a significant source of risk and opportunity. In contrast, in the first decade after the Kyoto Protocol entered into force, most investors either dismissed it or saw it primarily as only a risk factor for the largest greenhouse gas emitters. The force that drives action to mitigate climate change, to adapt to changes that are unavoidable, and to capitalize on opportunities created by the shift to a lower-carbon economy is increasingly in the private sector, and not in Washington.

Moreover, even within the public sector, there is increasing disunity between policies and regulations pursued by state and local governments and those advanced in the nation’s capital. For example, 20 US states plus the District of Columbia have instituted their own Greenhouse Gas Emissions targets.1 When the Trump Administration announced that the US would withdraw from the Paris Agreement, over 1,400 cities, states and businesses released a statement of continued support for the goals of the Paris Agreement and committing to take the actions necessary to significantly reduce emissions.

The market sees climate change as a risk, presenting opportunities for investment in companies providing solutions to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of this risk. Pure business economics are driving the merits of investing in these companies. The substantial decrease in the cost of renewable generation has increased their ability to compete with both coal generation and natural gas, providing opportunities to invest in companies contributing to power generation from solar and wind. Additionally, companies providing energy efficiency solutions are helping reduce costs while reducing emissions. Opportunities across energy efficiency abound — LED lighting, energy transmission, industrial processes and automotives to name a few.

Just as the shift in drivers to climate solutions creates opportunity, the pure economics of outmoded energy generation provide a guide post to investors on which companies to avoid. Coal is a prime example. Most analysts expect little or no impact from the Administration’s climate policies on the declining market for coal, including some of the CEOs in the coal industry itself.

Disruptive Technologies

We’ve long recognized technological and economic shifts from one model to another, like the shift from a transportation system based on horses to one based on fossil fuels, mean that some business models will prosper, and others will wither.

Today, the Internet of Things (IoT) is at the heart of a significant change in business model viability. IoT refers to an inter-connected network of devices able to collect and exchange data using embedded sensors. The concept and its various applications across industries has had a sweeping effect on company business models. At Pax, we seek companies that provide the technologies of the future, as well as those able to use it to enhance their own businesses, regardless of sector, from consumer discretionary to health care.

Amazon, which first used the internet to revolutionize how we shopped for books and has continually caused disruption across the retail sector through online shopping, extended its reach to groceries with its bid to acquire Whole Foods. Investors were immediately intrigued by the potential for lower costs in the grocery segment, enhanced distribution for Whole Foods and the combination of two strong brands, that are of particular interest to Millennials.

Investment results are affected not only by owning the right companies, but also by avoiding companies that are damaged by the “disruptive” technologies of other companies. When the Amazon-Whole Foods deal was announced, grocery stocks and food processing companies, as well as traditional retailers, lost billions of dollars in market value. Clearly, it is not only Amazon or Whole Foods shareholders that were affected. A recent article in Harvard Business Review noted that the announcement gave Amazon a 2.4% boost in stock price, while that of three more traditional grocery stores fell much more, from 6% to 14%. “Nobody in the industry,” said the author, “should be surprised that the future of retailing is moving toward a fusion of digital and physical experiences.”2

Some might call the sell-off in grocers, food companies and retailers such as Target a knee- jerk reaction and not a fundamental change in the way companies do business. We view it as more indicative of a long-term shift in how goods are sourced and sold. Even the initial public offering price (IPO) of Blue Apron, a meal-kit delivery service, was negatively impacted on the expectation that Amazon-Whole Foods could offer a similar service. At the very least, it should be a wake-up call for investors. Only time will tell.

Identifying Paradigm Shifts

Spotting the longer-term trends is a key factor in positioning portfolios, and while we also need to be aware of shorter-term trends, like recession indicators or inflated valuations, it’s important to distinguish paradigm shifts from cyclical movements. Recognition of these long-term shifts is key to identifying the stocks that will be winners and losers over the long run.


2 Darrell K. Rigby, “The Amazon-Whole Foods Deal Means Every Other Retailer’s Three-Year Plan Is Obsolete,” Harvard Business Review, June 21, 2017.

As of 6/30/17, Amazon, Inc. was 1.8% of the Pax Balanced Fund and 4.0% of the Pax Large Cap Fund, 2.3% of the Pax ESG Beta Dividend Fund and 2.6% of the Pax ESG Beta Quality Fund. Whole Foods Market, Inc. was 1.2% of the Pax Balanced Fund, 2.2% of the Pax Large Cap Fund, 0.2% of the Pax ESG Beta Dividend Fund, and 3.7% of the Pax Mid Cap Fund. Blue Apron was not held by any Pax World Funds. Holdings are subject to change.

Index Definitions

The S&P 500 Stock Index is an unmanaged index of large capitalization common stocks.

The Russell 1000 Growth Index is a market capitalizationweighted index that measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth rates.

The Russell 1000 Value Index is a market capitalizationweighted index that measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth rates.

The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the US equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, Far East) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the US and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 21 developed market country indices: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Performance for the MSCI EAFE Index is shown “net”, which includes dividend reinvestments after deduction of foreign withholding tax.

One cannot invest directly in an index.


Christopher Brown

Formerly the Chief Investment Strategist for Pax World Funds and a past member of the portfolio management teams for the Pax Balanced Fund, Pax Large Cap Fund and Pax MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index Fund, Chris Brown began his tenure at the firm in 1998, when he joined the company as Co-Portfolio Manager of the Pax Balanced Fund.

Prior to joining the firm, Chris was a Senior Manager at Fahnestock and Co., Inc., a New York Stock Exchange brokerage firm, from 1987 to 1998, and First Vice President from 1994 to 1998. Chris was also a Senior Vice President of H.G. Wellington and Co., Inc., from April 1998 to July 2006, where he served as an adviser on separately managed accounts. He is a graduate of the Boston University School of Management with a concentration in finance.

Authored Insights

Steve Falci, CFA®

Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies

Steve Falci is Executive Vice President and Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies at Impax Asset Management LLC, the North American division of Impax Asset Management Group and investment adviser to Pax World Funds.

Steve oversees the firm’s systematic equity, multi-asset and fixed income strategies, as well as the integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) research into these strategies.

Steve has more than 30 years of experience in investment management. Prior to joining the firm in 2014, he served as Head of Strategy Development, Sustainable Investments, at Kleinwort Benson Investors, where he provided strategic direction, product development and identification of new market opportunities in the sustainable investment business. Before that, Steve served as Chief Investment Officer of Equities at Calvert Group and was a Principal and Senior Portfolio Manager at Mellon Equity Associates.

Steve serves on the board of directors for the US Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF). He also serves on the board of directors for Mercy Investment Services and is the chairperson of their Investment Committee. Steve has a Master of Business Administration from the Stern School of Business at New York University, a Master of Arts from Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and a Bachelor of Science in economics from New York University. He is a CFA® charterholder.

Authored Insights

Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Fourth Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on systemic risks, including pandemic risk, climate risk, biodiversity loss, and racial and gender discrimination and inequality. All these issues have spread quickly around the globe, and all of them have and will continue to affect the economy and financial markets.

15 Oct 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Third Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on the rapid rebound in equities amid continued COVID-19 uncertainty, resiliency in sustainable investing and the sharper focus placed on sustainability as a result of the pandemic and uprising against racism.

13 Jul 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Second Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we cover the unprecedented market events of the first quarter and the continued economic uncertainty going forward due to the COVID-19 crisis. We also share perspective about how our investment discipline may help navigate elevated market volatility.

9 Apr 2020
Scroll to top
User Agent: CCBot/2.0 (