Hidden Risks

Rapidly shifting equity market

Equity markets are off to a roaring start in 2019, with the magnitude of returns receiving some impressive framing — the first quarter was the best quarter for the S&P 500 Index since the third quarter of 2009, and it was the best quarterly start to a year since 1998.

This follows a fourth quarter of 2018 that was characterized by extremes of its own when the S&P 500 Index sold off to bear market levels (down -20%) intraquarter, and it marked the worst December for equity markets since 1931.

With these back-to-back quarters of extremes, it’s not surprising that style and factor leadership in the equity markets shifted substantially in the first quarter:

  • Growth stocks resumed their dominance over value stocks.
  • Small caps outperformed large caps for the quarter, albeit, by a modest margin.
  • Cyclical sectors, like Energy, Information Technology and Industrials, were among the best performers in the first quarter after being the three worst performing sectors in the previous quarter.
  • US stocks resumed their multi-year outperformance of non-US developed market stocks after lagging modestly in the fourth quarter.

Investor risk appetite is back for now — but for how long?

Most striking was an abrupt change in investor risk appetite as higher beta stocks outperformed strongly for most of the early part of 2019. Part of the first quarter rally could be expected given the oversold conditions late in the fourth quarter; however, the predominant impetus was the abrupt change in Federal Reserve policy that many investors interpreted as an end to their tightening bias and rising rates.

Investors interpreted the Federal Reserve policy shift as a near-term reduction of recession risk, which would bode well for equities. But what does the policy shift say about the longer-term implications of rates and investor risk appetite?

Risks can go unrecognized

Investor risk perception at any point in time may not be a good reflection of reality at either the market or individual stock level.

Market valuations reflect current investor expectation of risk and opportunity; but they may be over- or under-reacting to risk. In the current environment, the perception of the end of Federal Reserve tightening has also led to a rally in bonds and falling yields. At lower yields, bonds are less attractive, which could lead investors to stretch for returns through equities and other riskier asset classes.

With equity valuations approaching levels that preceded the fourth quarter sell-off, investors may be losing sight of important underlying risks to the equity market, including weak global growth, a trending decline of the global Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI), waning fiscal stimulus impact in the US and slowing earnings growth.

Similarly, at the stock level, risks can also go unrecognized for varying periods of time. A common disconnect is for lower quality stocks to rise beyond their intrinsic value in speculative markets, where their risks are not fully discounted.

Sustainability risks may also lie hidden in the background. Consider, for example, what recently happened to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).

After the record-setting fires in California in 2018, the company’s 8-K financial filing last November noted that if it were found liable for those fires, it would be unable to cover the damages. The stock price plunged, predictably. And then the stock advanced a few days later, after the head of the California Public Utilities Commission said that he could not imagine allowing the company — the biggest utility in the state — to go bankrupt. At the end of January, PG&E did declare Chapter 11 bankruptcy, following which the share price began a gradual recovery in anticipation of the company’s eventual emergence from that bankruptcy.

It is appropriate that markets reacted to the news of PG&E’s liability, of course. But what these gyrations don’t say is that the wildfire risk that confronts the company is not new.

California comes off in almost all the climate models as becoming hotter and drier, and it’s a state that has a long history of severe wildfire. This puts a lot of assets at risk, including assets such as hundreds of miles of transmission and distribution wires. The wildfire risk also creates significant liabilities. Anytime there’s high danger of forest fires, any ignition source can set off a fire that burns thousands of acres and anything occupying those acres. As an operator of a lot of potentially spark-producing equipment and assets in fire-prone terrain, PG&E’s potential wildfire liability was already growing.

In short, knowledge of sustainability-related challenges should help us better identify hidden risks. Markets react to news and events, as well as financial information contained in required filings. But sustainability assessment gives us additional insight into risks that don’t show up in the news — except, of course, until after the event.

Interestingly, while the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy shift was the dominant news during the quarter, we also learned that the Federal Reserve has begun to consider climate risks in making policy. According to a March economic letter, “for the Fed, the volatility induced by climate change and the efforts to adapt to new conditions and to limit or mitigate climate change are also increasingly relevant considerations.”

Longer-term focus for the market, and longer-term discipline on sustainability risks

Increased risk awareness began to creep back into the market in March as beta backed off the leadership it established in the first two months of 2019. After such a swift and dramatic expansion of market price-to-earnings (P/E) valuations early this year, there are signs that market participants may be taking a longer-term focus as equity risks are coming into better view.

At the stock level, we believe integrating ESG analysis is an essential component of comprehensively understanding a stock’s long-term risk. Sustainability risks play out over the longer-term, as potential liabilities actually materialize, and that is one reason why we see ESG investing as a natural fit for long-term investors. 


Index Definitions

The S&P 500 Stock Index is an unmanaged index of large capitalization common stocks.
One cannot invest directly in an index.

PAX008528

Steve Falci, CFA®

Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies

Steve Falci is Executive Vice President and Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies at Impax Asset Management LLC, the North American division of Impax Asset Management Group and investment adviser to Pax World Funds.

Steve oversees the firm’s systematic equity, multi-asset and fixed income strategies, as well as the integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) research into these strategies.

Steve has more than 30 years of experience in investment management. Prior to joining the firm in 2014, he served as Head of Strategy Development, Sustainable Investments, at Kleinwort Benson Investors, where he provided strategic direction, product development and identification of new market opportunities in the sustainable investment business. Before that, Steve served as Chief Investment Officer of Equities at Calvert Group and was a Principal and Senior Portfolio Manager at Mellon Equity Associates.

Steve serves on the board of directors for the US Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF). He also serves on the board of directors for Mercy Investment Services and is the chairperson of their Investment Committee. Steve has a Master of Business Administration from the Stern School of Business at New York University, a Master of Arts from Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and a Bachelor of Science in economics from New York University. He is a CFA® charterholder.

Authored Insights

Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Fourth Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on systemic risks, including pandemic risk, climate risk, biodiversity loss, and racial and gender discrimination and inequality. All these issues have spread quickly around the globe, and all of them have and will continue to affect the economy and financial markets.

15 Oct 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Third Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on the rapid rebound in equities amid continued COVID-19 uncertainty, resiliency in sustainable investing and the sharper focus placed on sustainability as a result of the pandemic and uprising against racism.

13 Jul 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Second Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we cover the unprecedented market events of the first quarter and the continued economic uncertainty going forward due to the COVID-19 crisis. We also share perspective about how our investment discipline may help navigate elevated market volatility.

9 Apr 2020

Julie Gorte, Ph.D.

Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing

Julie Gorte is Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing at Impax Asset Management LLC, the North American division of Impax Asset Management Group and investment adviser to Pax World Funds.

She oversees environmental, social and governance-related research on prospective and current investments as well as the firm’s shareholder engagement and public policy advocacy. Julie is also a member of the Impax Gender Analytics team.

Prior to joining the firm, Julie served as Vice President and Chief Social Investment Strategist at Calvert. Her experience before she joined the investment world in 1999 includes a various number of roles. Julie spent nearly 14 years as Senior Associate and Project Director at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Additionally, she has held the roles of Vice President for Economic and Environmental Research at The Wilderness Society, and Program Manager for Technology Programs in the Environmental Protection Agency’s policy office and Senior Associate at the Northeast-Midwest Institute.

Julie serves on the boards of the Endangered Species Coalition, E4theFuture, Clean Production Action and is the board chair of the Sustainable Investments Institute.

Julie received a Ph.D. and Master of Science in resource economics from Michigan State University and a Bachelor of Science in forest management at Northern Arizona University.

Recent Insights

Scroll to top
User Agent: CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)