Volatility is Back; ESG Risk Mitigation is here to Stay

A Quarter of Sharp Ups and Downs

The first quarter of 2018 is in the books, and while the headline may be the S&P 500 Index’s first negative quarter since 2015, the defining narrative was the volatile path along the way.

Figure 1: S&P 500 Index Performance over trailing 1 year ending 3/31/18:

Source: Factset.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

January began along the same trajectory as 2017 ended. The S&P 500 Index continued its straight march up through late-January rising almost 7.5% with a favorable backdrop of economic stimulus from tax cuts and company earnings that largely exceeded expectations.

Equity markets then abruptly sold off significantly over two weeks, with S&P 500 Index touching correction levels of -10% on inflation fears and the potential impact on interest rates.

The S&P 500 Index retraced that correction over the balance of February gaining 10% before selling off again in March. March’s negative returns were largely driven by two developments: data concerns at Facebook triggered a steep drop in Technology shares, and later in the month fears of a trade war between the US and China weighed on the market.

The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) and a closer look at the daily market return swings help illustrate the extent to which volatility returned to the market. After witnessing only eight days in all of 2017 in which daily market returns were up or down 1%, there were a total of 23 days where the market endured a swing of 1% over the last 10 weeks of the first quarter. The VIX, a commonly referred to measure of perceived investor risk, hit its lowest level in more than 25 years during the fourth quarter of 2017 but spiked from levels under 10 to 35 in early February 2018.

Figure 2: CBOE Volatility Index VIX) – Trailing 1 Year Total Return period ending 3/31/18:

Source: Factset.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

With the return of volatility brings a heightened attentiveness to risk. It also presents opportunities for active managers to identify mispriced risk on an individual company level. At Pax, ESG analysis contributes to our risk management, and to better illustrate that link, we’ve rounded up recently published research that continues to support the notion that ESG integration is associated with risk mitigation.

Recent Studies Reinforce Beneficial Relationship Between ESG and Risk

Whether the market is volatile or not, risk is always something investors want to incorporate in their evaluation of opportunities. Understanding the risks inherent in unsustainable operations is at the heart of sustainable investing. Sustainable investors have long understood that ESG factors are material.

A survey last year by the CFA Institute found that about two-thirds of respondents who consider ESG issues did so in order to help manage investment risks. They’re on to something.

“There’s a lot of support for the idea that understanding sustainability can help investors avoid paying too much for companies with mispriced risks”

MSCI, for example, reports that companies with better performance on ESG measures are less likely to have a value-damaging controversy, and are less exposed to systemic risk factors. That, in turn, lowers their cost of capital.

Avoiding controversies is not always possible. Even investors who engage in thorough ESG diligence can sometimes be surprised by an unforeseen and unfortunate event. We’re reminded of that recently when we look at headlines about companies whose value has plummeted due to sexual harassment, and how boards need to include harassment on their list of risks to be overseen.

Controversies like this, according to Sustainalytics, depresses company market capitalization by an average of 6% within ten days of the incident becoming public knowledge — and while those dips in value go away eventually if nothing else happens, they do add up over time. Companies with fewer ESG incidents outperformed the global equity market by 11% between 2014 and 2017, according to the Sustainalytics paper.

One of the ESG risks that the market is quickly learning to understand is climate change. Climate risk is sometimes viewed as primarily regulatory risk — but there are other climate risks as well, including litigation, reputation, and physical risks from things like droughts, floods, fires, and increasingly severe storms. All of these things together add up to a smorgasbord of risks that prompted the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) in the UK to caution its members that they could be subject to litigation from trustees if they do not highlight financial risks of climate change.

One approach to climate risk in portfolio management is to measure and reduce a portfolio’s carbon intensity, something Pax has been doing for several years — and that has real financial impact. A 2016 study looked at 11 different low-carbon, climate-friendly indexes and found that ten of them had higher returns over time than their mainstream benchmarks.

Another of the ESG risks that’s been making a lot of headlines lately is gender discrimination. We believe gender lens investing — which means investing in companies that invest in women — can be an effective strategy for avoiding risk associated with the lack of gender diversity in companies’ leadership ranks. A recent study of Australian firms showed that firms with more women on boards significantly reduced the risk of default.

Balancing Macro Risks with Economic and Earnings Strength

Looking through all the volatility in February and March, the S&P 500 Index is off nearly -10% from its late-January peak. The price decline combined with continuing strong earnings growth have left market valuations at more reasonable levels. However, the return of volatility may be one indication that investors will be more apt to balance risks as they evaluate first quarter earnings. Macro risks that may be factored into investment decisions include the impact of any trade war, signs of inflation acceleration or early signs of a slow-down in the economy.

As always, company-specific ESG risks will remain a focus at Pax. We believe integrating ESG into investment decisions can have a real, positive payoff for investors that undergo the effort. And while every idea does not outperform financial markets every day, we believe that in the long term, sustainability will be a more rewarding risk-return proposition than the alternative.

Index Definitions

The S&P 500 Stock Index is an unmanaged index of large capitalization common stocks.
The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index (VIX) shows the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility. It is constructed using the implied volatilities of a wide range of S&P 500 index options. This volatility is meant to be forward looking, is calculated from both calls and puts, and is a widely used measure of market risk.
One cannot invest directly in an index.


Steve Falci, CFA®

Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies

Steve Falci is Executive Vice President and Head of Systematic & Multi-Asset Strategies at Impax Asset Management LLC, the North American division of Impax Asset Management Group and investment adviser to Pax World Funds.

Steve oversees the firm’s systematic equity, multi-asset and fixed income strategies, as well as the integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) research into these strategies.

Steve has more than 30 years of experience in investment management. Prior to joining the firm in 2014, he served as Head of Strategy Development, Sustainable Investments, at Kleinwort Benson Investors, where he provided strategic direction, product development and identification of new market opportunities in the sustainable investment business. Before that, Steve served as Chief Investment Officer of Equities at Calvert Group and was a Principal and Senior Portfolio Manager at Mellon Equity Associates.

Steve serves on the board of directors for the US Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF). He also serves on the board of directors for Mercy Investment Services and is the chairperson of their Investment Committee. Steve has a Master of Business Administration from the Stern School of Business at New York University, a Master of Arts from Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and a Bachelor of Science in economics from New York University. He is a CFA® charterholder.

Authored Insights

Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Fourth Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on systemic risks, including pandemic risk, climate risk, biodiversity loss, and racial and gender discrimination and inequality. All these issues have spread quickly around the globe, and all of them have and will continue to affect the economy and financial markets.

15 Oct 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Third Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we share perspectives on the rapid rebound in equities amid continued COVID-19 uncertainty, resiliency in sustainable investing and the sharper focus placed on sustainability as a result of the pandemic and uprising against racism.

13 Jul 2020
Pax World Funds Investment Outlook: Second Quarter 2020

In this quarter’s commentary, we cover the unprecedented market events of the first quarter and the continued economic uncertainty going forward due to the COVID-19 crisis. We also share perspective about how our investment discipline may help navigate elevated market volatility.

9 Apr 2020

Julie Gorte, Ph.D.

Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing

Julie Gorte is Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing at Impax Asset Management LLC, the North American division of Impax Asset Management Group and investment adviser to Pax World Funds.

She oversees environmental, social and governance-related research on prospective and current investments as well as the firm’s shareholder engagement and public policy advocacy. Julie is also a member of the Impax Gender Analytics team.

Prior to joining the firm, Julie served as Vice President and Chief Social Investment Strategist at Calvert. Her experience before she joined the investment world in 1999 includes a various number of roles. Julie spent nearly 14 years as Senior Associate and Project Director at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Additionally, she has held the roles of Vice President for Economic and Environmental Research at The Wilderness Society, and Program Manager for Technology Programs in the Environmental Protection Agency’s policy office and Senior Associate at the Northeast-Midwest Institute.

Julie serves on the boards of the Endangered Species Coalition, E4theFuture, Clean Production Action and is the board chair of the Sustainable Investments Institute.

Julie received a Ph.D. and Master of Science in resource economics from Michigan State University and a Bachelor of Science in forest management at Northern Arizona University.

Recent Insights

Scroll to top
User Agent: CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)